|
|
Ten Important Research Findings on
Marriage & Choosing a Marriage Partner:
Helpful Facts for Young Adults
by
David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead
1. Marrying as a teenager is the highest known risk
factor for divorce.
People who marry in their teens are two to three
times more likely to divorce than people who marry
in their twenties or older.
2. The most likely way to find a future marriage
partner is through an introduction by family,
friends, or acquaintances.
Despite the romantic notion that people meet and
fall in love through chance or fate, the evidence
suggests that social networks are important in
bringing together individuals of similar interests
and backgrounds, especially when it comes to
selecting a marriage partner. According to a
large-scale national survey of sexuality, almost
sixty percent of married people were introduced by
family, friends, co-workers or other acquaintances.
3. The more similar people are in their values,
backgrounds and life goals, the more likely they are
to have a successful marriage.
Opposites may attract but they may not live together
harmoniously as married couples. People who share
common backgrounds and similar social networks are
better suited as marriage partners than people who
are very different in their backgrounds and
networks.
4. Women have a significantly better chance of
marrying if they do not become single parents before
marrying.
Having a child out of wedlock reduces the chances of
ever marrying. Despite the growing numbers of
potential marriage partners with children, one study
noted, "having children is still one of the least
desirable characteristics a potential marriage
partner can possess." The only partner
characteristic men and women rank as even less
desirable than having children is the inability to
hold a steady job.
5. Both women and men who are college educated are
more likely to marry, and less likely to divorce,
than people with lower levels of education.
Despite occasional news stories predicting lifelong
singlehood for college-educated women, these
predictions have proven false. Though the first
generation of college educated women (those who
earned baccalaureate degrees in the 1920s) married
less frequently than their less well-educated peers,
the reverse is true today. College educated women's
chances of marrying are better than less
well-educated women. However, the growing gender gap
in college education may make it more difficult for
college women to find similarly well-educated men in
the future. This is already a problem for
African-American female college graduates, who
greatly outnumber African-American male college
graduates.
6. Living together before marriage has not proved
useful as a "trial marriage."
People who have multiple cohabiting relationships
before marriage are more likely to experience
marital conflict, marital unhappiness and eventual
divorce than people who do not cohabit before
marriage. Researchers attribute some but not all of
these differences to the differing characteristics
of people who cohabit, the so-called "selection
effect," rather than to the experience of cohabiting
itself. It has been hypothesized that the negative
effects of cohabitation on future marital success
may diminish as living together becomes a common
experience among today's young adults. However,
according to one recent study of couples who were
married between 1981 and 1997, the negative effects
persist among younger cohorts, supporting the view
that the cohabitation experience itself contributes
to problems in marriage.
7. Marriage helps people to generate income and
wealth.
Compared to those who merely live together, people
who marry become economically better off. Men become
more productive after marriage; they earn between
ten and forty percent more than do single men with
similar education and job histories. Marital social
norms that encourage healthy, productive behavior
and wealth accumulation play a role. Some of the
greater wealth of married couples results from their
more efficient specialization and pooling of
resources, and because they save more. Married
people also receive more money from family members
than the unmarried (including cohabiting couples),
probably because families consider marriage more
permanent and more binding than a living-together
union.
8. People who are married are more likely to have
emotionally and physically satisfying sex lives than
single people or those who just live together.
Contrary to the popular belief that married sex is
boring and infrequent, married people report higher
levels of sexual satisfaction than both sexually
active singles and cohabiting couples, according to
the most comprehensive and recent survey of
sexuality. Forty-two percent of wives said that they
found sex extremely emotionally and physically
satisfying, compared to just 31 percent of single
women who had a sex partner. And 48 percent of
husbands said sex was extremely satisfying
emotionally, compared to just 37 percent of
cohabiting men. The higher level of commitment in
marriage is probably the reason for the high level
of reported sexual satisfaction; marital commitment
contributes to a greater sense of trust and
security, less drug and alcohol-infused sex, and
more mutual communication between the couple.
9. People who grow up in a family broken by divorce
are slightly less likely to marry, and much more
likely to divorce when they do marry.
According to one study the divorce risk nearly
triples if one marries someone who also comes from a
broken home. The increased risk is much lower,
however, if the marital partner is someone who grew
up in a happy, intact family.
10. For large segments of the population, the risk of
divorce is far below fifty percent.
Although the overall divorce rate in America remains
close to fifty percent of all marriages, it has been
dropping gradually over the past two decades. Also,
the risk of divorce is far below fifty percent for
educated people going into their first marriage, and
lower still for people who wait to marry at least
until their mid-twenties, haven't lived with many
different partners prior to marriage, or are
strongly religious and marry someone of the same
faith.
Research Sources
1. Teenage marriage and divorce
Depending on how the age categories are delineated
and the length of the time period covered after
marriage, teenage marriages have been found to be
from two to three times more likely to end in
divorce compared to marriages at older ages. See T.
C. Martin and L. Bumpass "Recent Trends in Marital
Disruption," Demography 26 (1989): 37-5. A recent
government study found that 59% of marriages for
women under age 18 end in divorce or separation
within 15 years, compared with 36% of those married
at age 20 or older. National Center for Health
Statistics, Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and
Remarriage in the United States. (Hyattsville, MD:
Department of Health and Human Services, 2002),
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_022.pdf
2. Finding a marriage partner
Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T.
Michael, and Stuart Michaels, The Social
Organization of Sexuality (Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press, 1994) pp. 234-5.
3. People of similar backgrounds
Finnegan Alford-Cooper, For Keeps: Marriages that
Last a Lifetime (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe,
1998); Judith Wallerstein and Sandra Blakeslee,
The Good Marriage (Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1995); Jeffry H. Larson and Thomas B. Holman,
"Premarital Predictors of Marital Quality and
Stability," Family Relations 43 (1994):
228-237; Robert Lauer and Jeanette Lauer, "Factors
in Long-Term Marriage," Journal of Family Issues
7:4 (1986): 382-390.
4. Single parents and marriage
Gayle Kaufman and Frances Goldscheider, "Willingness
to Stepparent: Attitudes Toward Partners Who Already
Have Children," paper presented at the annual
meeting of the American Sociological Association,
2003. Available at (http://www.asanet.org/convention/2003/program.html).
On the situation of African-American men and women,
see Orlando Patterson, Rituals of Blood:
Consequences of Slavery in Two American Centuries
(Washington, DC: Civitas, 1998): 72-76.
5. College education and marriage
Joshua R. Goldstein and Catharine T. Kenney,
"Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort
Forecasts of First Marriage for U. S. Women,"
American Sociological Review 66 (2001) 506-519;
Elaina Rose, "Education and Hypergamy in Marriage
Markets," (Seattle, WA: Department of Economics,
University of Washington, 2004). Available at
http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/erose/hypergamy_v2a_paper.pdf
6. Cohabitation as trial marriage
See discussion in Claire M. Kamp Dush, Catherine L. Cohan,
and Paul R. Amato, "The Relationship between
Cohabitation and Marital Quality and Stability:
Change Across Cohorts?" Journal of Marriage and
the Family 65 (August 2003): 539-49. For a
comprehensive review of the research on the
relationship between cohabitation and risk of
marital disruption, see David Popenoe and Barbara
Dafoe Whitehead, Should We Live Together?,
2nd Ed. (New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage
Project, Rutgers University, 2002). See also William
G. Axinn and Jennifer S. Barber, "Living
Arrangements and Family Formation Attitudes in Early
Adulthood," Journal of Marriage and the Family
59 (1997): 595-611; William J. Axinn and Arland
Thornton, "The Relationship Between Cohabitation and
Divorce: Selectivity or Causal Influence,"
Demography 29-3 (1992): 357-374; Robert Schoen
"First Unions and the Stability of First Marriages,"
Journal of Marriage and the Family 54 (1992):
281-84. However, living together with the person
one intends to marry does not increase the risk of
divorce. For first time cohabiting couples who
eventually marry, living together is linked to the
engagement process. See, for example, Jay Teachman,
"Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation and the
Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women,"
Journal of Marriage and the Family 65 (May
2003): 444-455; Susan L. Brown and Alan Booth,
"Cohabitation versus Marriage: A Comparison of
Relationship Quality," Journal of Marriage and
the Family 58 (1996): 668-678.
7. Marriage and wealth
Thomas A. Hirschl, Joyce Altobelli, and Mark R.
Rank, "Does Marriage Increase the Odds of Affluence?
Exploring the Life Course Probabilities," Journal
of Marriage and the Family 65-4 (2003): 927-938;
Lingxin Hao, "Family Structure, Private Transfers,
and the Economic Well-Being of Families with
Children," Social Forces 75 (1996): 269-292;
Jeffrey S. Gray and Michael J. Vanderhart, "The
Determination of Wages: Does Marriage Matter?," in
Linda Waite, et. al. (eds.) The Ties that Bind:
Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation (New
York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2000): 356-367; S. Korenman
and D. Neumark, "Does Marriage Really Make Men More
Productive?" Journal of Human Resources 26-2
(1991): 282-307; Joseph Lupton and James P. Smith,
"Marriage, Assets and Savings," in Shoshana A.
Grossbard-Schectman (ed.) Marriage and the
Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2003): 129-152; K. Daniel, "The Marriage Premium,"
in M. Tomassi and K Ierulli (eds.) The New
Economics of Human Behavior (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1995) 113-125.
8. Marriage and sex
Linda J. Waite and Kara Joyner, "Emotional and
Physical Satisfaction with Sex in Married,
Cohabiting, and Dating Sexual Unions: Do Men and
Women Differ?," in E. O. Laumann and R. T. Michael
(eds.), Sex, Love and Health in America
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001):
239-269; Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert
T. Michael, and Stuart Michaels, The Social
Organization of Sexuality (Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press, 1994).
9. People from broken homes
Jay D. Teachman, "The Childhood Living Arrangements
of Children and the Characteristics of Their
Marriages," Journal of Family Issues 25-1
(2004): 86-111. One study found that when the wife
alone had experienced a parental divorce, the odds
of divorce increased by more than half (59%), but
when both spouses experienced parental divorce, the
odds of divorce nearly tripled (189%). Paul R.
Amato, "Explaining the Intergenerational
Transmission of Divorce," Journal of Marriage and
the Family 58 (August, 1996): 628-640. Another
study suggests that the main reason people who
experience a parental divorce have a higher divorce
rate themselves is because they tend to hold a
comparatively weak commitment to the norm of
lifelong marriage. Paul R. Amato and Danelle D.
DeBoer, "The Transmission of Marital Instability
Across Generations: Relationship Skills or
Commitment to Marriage?" Journal of Marriage and
the Family 63 (November, 2001): 1038-1051.
Research on mate selection and marital success is
reviewed in Jeffry H. Larson and Thomas B. Holman,
"Premarital Predictors of Marital Quality and
Stability," Family Relations 43 (1994):
228-237. On the lower marriage rate of the children
of divorce, see Nicholas H. Wolfinger, "Parental
Divorce and Offspring Marriage: Early or Late?"
Social Forces (September, 2003): 337-353.
10. The risk of divorce
Some primary sources for the risk factors associated
with divorce and the divorce rate trend are Jay D.
Teachman, "Stability Across Cohorts in Divorce Risk
Factors," Demography 39 (2002): 331-351; Tim
B. Heaton, "Factors Contributing to Increasing
Marital Stability in the United States," Journal
of Family Issues 23-3 (April, 2002): 392-409;
For a review of research, see Jeffry H. Larson and
Thomas B. Holman, "Premarital Predictors of Marital
Quality and Stability," Family Relations 43
(1994): 228-237.
|
|